|
|
Enabling
Environment Initiative:
The Initiative |
Recommendations |
Fiscal Reforms

|
The
Concept
The EEI sought state and civic action to advance the role, growth and
development of civil society and its effort for public benefit. Under this
initiative, 65 country-wide consultations were organised involving
over 2,200 participants. These included senior decision makers,
government representatives, media, business leaders, funding
agencies, NGOs and NGO coalitions from the federal, provincial and
district level.
The aim of the engagement was to provide
a forum for an open and candid discussion on
issues related to the regulation and
functioning of CSOs.
This encompassed public enquiry into the effectiveness of the
prevailing regulation on NPOs and recommendations for necessary
reforms to facilitate citizen organisations.
The process resulted in the formulation of a set of recommendations
and the articulation of a Draft NPO (Governance and Support)
Ordinance. |
The
Team
PCP
assembled a team of lawyers, citizen
organisation leaders and international
experts to manage the consultation process.
Institutional partners included the Aga Khan
Foundation-Pakistan (AKFP), and the NGO
Resource Centre (NGORC). Logistical and
organisational support was rendered by NGOs
with provincial presence and local
capacities:
Trust for Voluntary Organization
(TVO) Indus Resource Centre
(IRC)
Participatory Integrated Development
Society (PIDS)
Punjab Rural Support Program
(PRSP) Sarhad Rural Support Program
(SRSP)
Closely
guiding and providing oversight to this very
complex and multi-layered exercise was the
PCP Board, led by Chairman, Dr.
Shamsh Kassim-Lakha.
The EEI team participated
as catalysts, provoking thoughtful
discussion and enlarging the canvas with
historical experiences and a critical review
of the full range of legislation. |

The Pakistan Centre for Philanthropy formulated
five clusters of
recommendations as an outcome of the
Enabling Environment Initiative:
A fundamental reform of laws
regulating citizen organisation for public
benefit to overcome fatal philosophical and
technical flaws in current laws.
Specifically, the
Voluntary Social Welfare Agencies Ordinance
1961 and Societies Registration Act 1860
should be consolidated, rationalised, and
modernised into one public benefit
organisations law, the “Nonprofit Public
Benefit Organisations (Governance and
Support) Act 2003”.
Change
in the structure and
nature of the regulatory function of
government. As contained in the proposed new NPO law, responsibility for regulation
should be shifted from the diverse parts of
government (across which it is now
distributed) to autonomous statutory bodies;
one federal and one for each province,
governed by representatives from government,
citizen organisations, business,
professionals and eminent citizens.
Tax
benefits and fiscal support for NPOs. First and most important, the
definition of organisations qualifying for
various tax benefits should be broadened to
include a wider set of purposes. Second,
further additions to the menu of fiscal
supports available to citizen organisations
should be made. Third, access to existing
benefits needs to be simplified and
administered more effectively.
Purposeful dialogue
between government and citizen organisations. It is the unequivocal conviction
of the EEI that in the absence of such
dialogue very little substantive
improvements in the operations of nonprofit
public benefit organisations will occur.
Absent formal dialogue and vigorous efforts
to popularise that dialogue, citizens at
large will not renew their faith in
government and in their own potential to
organise for public benefit.
Reform
of other laws concerning citizens' organisations.
A number of other laws touch on aspects of
the domain of citizen organisation for
public benefit. This final
cluster of recommendations sets out a course
for reform regarding the most important of
these, including the Charitable Funds
(Regulation of Collection) Act 1953, the
Companies Ordinance 1984 (Section 42), the
Trust Act 1882 and scattered enactments
exclusively dealing with public trusts
(Charitable and Religious Trusts Act 1920,
Charitable Endowments Act 1890, Section 92
of the Civil Procedure Code 1902), the
Religious Societies Act 1880, the Charitable
and Religious Trusts Act 1920, the
Cooperative Societies Act 1925 and the Wakf
laws -- the Mussalman Wakf Validating
Acts, 1913 and 1930, the Mussalman Wakf
Act, 1923, and the provincial (Punjab, Sindh,
NWFP, Balochistan) Wakf Properties
Ordinance .
Instigated by the EEI,
important liberalising reforms were
instituted in 2002 through the Finance
Ordinance (amending the Income Tax Ordinance
2001). These
include:
Purposes
broadened:
“Development
purposes” have been included in the
definition of NPO in section 2(36). The definition of “charitable
purposes” that was omitted has been re-inserted as section 2(11A).
Through the Finance Ordinance 2002,
the term “nonprofit organisation” has
been included in Clause 58 and 59 to widen
the purposes for which organisations are
eligible for exemptions and other related
benefits.
Utilisation
of funds: The
ceiling of maximum Rs 20,000 as unutilised
funds for the year have been relaxed in the
new tax rules.
Rules
made enabling:
By promulgation of chapter XVII of the
Income Tax Rules 2002 the whole fiscal
regime has been made very enabling. The
discretionary authority of tax officials has
been greatly diluted by creating a provision
of appeal and making it mandatory for tax
officials to follow a mandatory timeframe
and in case of rejection of tax exemption to
give reasons in writing.
Mandatory
condition of chartered accountant removed:
The
new tax rules have also provided for a
graduated standard of financial reporting.
Small NPOs are no longer compelled to
provide accounts audited by chartered
accountants. NPOs with annual receipts of
less than Rs 0.5 million can file accounts
audited by retired audit officer or a bank
manager.
Principle
of independent certification agency
accepted.
In Rule 211, the principle of having an
independent evaluation and certification
agency has been accepted and incorporated in
the law.
Annual
renewal changed to three-year renewal:
Previously annual renewals were required.
The new Rule 214, has provided for renewals
up to three years subject to report of the
certification agency and audit results.
What
were you looking for on this page but did not find?
Tell us
|
|
|